Which type of question is generally considered more appropriate for hypothesis-driven research?

Comparative questions are particularly well-suited for hypothesis-driven research as they specifically aim to test differences between groups or conditions based on a prespecified hypothesis. In hypothesis-driven research, researchers start with a clear hypothesis that predicts a relationship or difference based on prior theoretical frameworks or empirical evidence. Comparative questions facilitate this by directing the researcher to compare two or more groups or conditions, allowing for statistical analysis to determine if the observed differences support or refute the hypothesis.

Descriptive questions focus on detailing characteristics or outcomes without necessarily testing a hypothesis, making them less aligned with hypothesis-driven approaches. Exploratory questions generally aim to investigate new areas where little prior knowledge exists, which is also distinct from the confirmatory nature of hypothesis-driven research. Closed-ended questions can be part of hypothesis testing but do not inherently carry the comparative aspect unless used specifically to compare groups. Therefore, comparative questions are the most appropriate for hypothesis-driven research, as they directly align with the goals of testing specific predictions.